S&w m&p 2.0 compact review

Smith & Wesson M&P 2.0 Review – This Time they Got it Right

s&w m&p 2.0 compact review

The Smith and Wesson M&P Compact is in someways BETTER than the Glock 19 I carry. Let’s go through some of the features of the M&P compact and I will provide some comparisons to by beloved Glock 19 as we go. Overall, I give Smith and Wesson’s M&P Compact glowing.

get   can   how

The M2. I was ready to especially experience the improved trigger, audible and tactile short reset, the more aggressive grip and improved ergonomics, 4 palmswell inserts, and the stainless steel chassis, etc. Thanks to Smith-Wesson I was able to receive one of the first ones produced to test and evaluate it for readers, students, and for myself. I wondered if this M2. Does the extended steel chassis help any with muzzle flip and felt recoil?

Although they were well-made, they left a few things to be desired. Most notably, the interchangeable back strap that allows a shooter to customize the pistol to the size of their hands. Likewise, a magazine disconnect safety is available for shooters that want one. Other factory options include night sights. One of our first reviews for Ammoland.

This gun is direct competition for the Glock 19, and that is exciting. It is great to see some serious competition in the category, made in America by a firm that has a very long history of producing personal-protection and service sidearms, as well as diminutive hideout guns. The M2. For my review, I requested a thumb safety model; I like shooting M pistols, and have trained with them a good deal, so my hope is that the manual of arms between the Compact and my. After receiving the gun, I disassembled it and gave it a pretty thorough cleaning. To really wring out the Compact, I wanted to shoot more than the typical test rounds. I see this gun as a high-volume utility firearm, in the same vein as the Glock 19, capable of excellent performance at the range and reliable service for law enforcement, military personnel and, of course, defense-minded armed citizens.

I love me a good, mid-sized 9mm, but up until now I had lost a bit of interest in the genre due to, well, a rather boring and dry market filled with what is basically variations of the same gun. I found myself with a whole day, one thousand rounds, and a brand new 2. Before I start this review, I need to address the elephant in the room when it comes to the factions I know will be reading this. The proverbial elephant comes in the form of the Glock 19 and its variants. I know that many of you are looking for a head-to-head comparison, but I will save that for the YouTube guys and the clickbaiters.

Smith wanted to get its share of the market back, which it had totally owned in the revolver days. Large and heavy but totally reliable, the served well until agencies began transitioning to the much lighter and easier-to-shoot Glock 17 or Neither was received well, and Glock continued to reel in more LE and commercial users. Smith used some of the basic concepts involved in the Sigmas — such as its articulating trigger safety and striker-fired operation — and added in ergonomic research to make a pistol that felt better than the Glock in the hand. This is still a major criticism of the Glock. It took Glock quite a while to come up with their own interchangeable back strap system that performed a similar function. Smith also included a molded-in accessory rail as part of the grip assembly.



2,000-Round Review: Smith & Wesson M&P M2.0 Compact

We made it! Each segment of testing is available here:.

Smith & Wesson M&P 2.0 Compact Pistol Review – VIDEO

.

.

.

.

.

0 thoughts on “S&w m&p 2.0 compact review

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *